Can cutting Carbohydrates from your diet make you live longer? | Mail Online

Can cutting carbohydrates from your diet make you live longer?

By Jerome Burne
Last updated at 9:05 AM on 26th October 2010

It’s an extraordinary claim. But scientists say you can extend your life AND stay fit throughout old age – just by a change of diet that switches on your youth gene…

Woman with the youth gene

Professor Kenyon has found out why ­drastically reducing calories has such a remarkable effect

For centuries man has dreamed of being immortal, fixated on tales of magic fountains that restore youth, the rejuvenating power of a vampire’s bite or asses’ milk.

More recently came claims that injections of monkey glands or hormone supplements would make us live longer.

But so far, what’s actually worked are ­medical advances such as vaccines and better living conditions. Over the past century these have boosted average life expectancy by far more than 50 per cent, from 50 to 88.

The problem is that this longevity does not mean a healthier life. Indeed, thanks to chronic diseases such as diabetes and arthritis, we’re becoming like the Struldbruggs — the miserable characters in Gulliver’s Travels who were immortal, but still suffered from all the ­diseases of old age.

Gradually they lost their teeth, their hair, their sense of smell and taste. All their diseases got worse and their memory faded, so they had no idea who their friends and relations were. At funerals they wept because they couldn’t die.

But now a U.S. geneticist is thought to have discovered the secret to a long life, full of health and energy. And the answer might be as simple as cutting down on carbohydrates.

Professor Cynthia Kenyon, whom many experts believe should win the Nobel Prize for her research into ageing, has discovered that the carbohydrates we eat — from bananas and potatoes to bread, pasta, biscuits and cakes — directly affect two key genes that govern youthfulness and longevity.

She made her remarkable breakthrough after studying roundworms, specifically the C.elegans, a worm just a millimetre in size that lives in soil in temperate climates all over the world.

By tweaking some of their genes she has been able to help these worms live up to six times longer than normal. ‘Not only that, but we also know how to make them stay healthy all that time as well,’ she told an audience at the Wellcome Collection in London earlier this month.

So, what do worms have to do with us?

A great deal, it seems. Professor Kenyon’s work has been successfully repeated in labs around the world — the genes she found controlling ageing in worms do the same thing in rats and mice, probably monkeys, and there are signs they are active in humans, too.

This work has revolutionised our understanding of ageing, explains Jeff Holly, professor of clinical sciences at Bristol University.

‘Ten years ago we thought ageing was probably the result of a slow decay, a sort of rusting,’ he says. ‘But Professor Kenyon has shown that it’s not about wear and tear, but instead it is controlled by genes. That opens the possibility of slowing it down with drugs.’

So how does a worm hold the key to human ageing?

At 18 days old the average roundworm is flabby, ­sluggish and wrinkled. Two days later it will probably be dead.

Woman eating bread

The carbohydrates we eat directly affect two key genes that govern youthfulness and longevity

However, Professor Kenyon, based at the University of California, San Francisco, found that damping down the activity of just one of their genes had a dramatic effect.

‘Instead of dying at about 20 days, our first set of mutant worms carried on living to more than 40 days,’ she says.

‘And they weren’t sluggish and worn out — they behaved like youngsters. It was a real shock. In human terms it was the equivalent of talking to someone you thought was about 30 and finding they were actually 60.’

With more sophisticated genetic manipulation, she now has some worms that have lived for an astonishing 144 days. An increase of that proportion would allow humans to live to 450.

Scientists already knew how to make laboratory animals live longer and healthier lives — you just cut back their calories to about three-quarters of their normal amount.

It’s not a practical solution for humans, because you feel cold and hungry all the time.

But what Professor Kenyon found out was why ­drastically reducing calories has such a remarkable effect.

She discovered that it changed the way two crucial genes behaved. It turned down the gene that controls insulin, which in turn switched on another gene, which acted like an elixir of life.

‘We jokingly called the first gene the Grim Reaper because when it’s switched on, the lifespan is fairly short,’ she explains.

The ­second ‘elixir’ gene seems to bring all the anti-ageing benefits — its proper name is DAF 16, but it was quickly nicknamed ‘Sweet Sixteen’ because it turned the worms into teenagers.

‘It sends out instructions to a whole range of repair and renovation genes,’ says Professor Kenyon.

‘Your supply of natural anti­oxidants goes up, damping down damaging free radicals.’

These are the ­compounds produced by our body and the environment, which are linked to a host of diseases from ­cancer to Alzheimer’s.

The Sweet Sixteen gene also ‘boosts compounds that make sure the skin and muscle-building ­proteins are working properly, the immune system becomes more active to fight infection and genes that are active in cancer get turned off,’ she adds.

Kenyon had stumbled on the genetic equivalent of Shangri-La, the fictional valley where people could live for years without really ageing.

Discovering the Grim Reaper gene has prompted the professor to ­dramatically alter her own diet, ­cutting right back on carbohydrates. That’s because carbs make your body produce more insulin (to mop up the extra blood sugar carbs ­produce); and more insulin means a more active Grim Reaper.

So the vital second gene, the ‘elixir’ one, won’t get turned on. To test this, last year she added a tiny amount of ­sugary glucose to the normal diet of some of her worms that had had their genes engineered so they were living much longer, healthier lives.

‘The effect was remarkable,’ she says. ‘The sugary glucose blocked the “youthful” genes and they lost most of the health gains.’

But was this just a special feature of the roundworm or did we all have it?

Following Kenyon’s lead, other researchers started looking for the Grim Reaper/ Sweet Sixteen combination in other animals — and of course in humans. They found it.

One clue came from a small remote community of dwarves living in northern Ecuador who are cancer-free. They are missing the part of the Grim Reaper gene that controls a hormone called insulin-like growth factor. The downside is they only grow to 4ft tall because the hormone is needed for growth.

But this missing bit of the Grim Reaper gene also means they don’t develop cancer and are less likely to suffer from heart disease or obesity.

Professor Jeff Holly, who specialises in insulin-like growth factor, confirms that it is linked to cancer of the prostate, breast and colon.

In fact raised insulin levels, triggered by high carbohydrate ­consumption, could be what ­connects many of our big killers.

Research is at its early stage, but raised insulin triggers an increase in cholesterol production in the liver, makes the walls of blood vessels ­contract so blood pressure goes up and stimulates the release of fats called triglycerides (linked to heart disease).

Professor Kenyon’s work is ­creating a wave of excitement among drug companies who’ve been researching molecules that will damp down the Grim Reaper and boost Sweet ­Sixteen, giving us the benefits of very low-calorie diets without the ­penalties. So far, none is very near being approved.

One way to reduce insulin levels is to exercise, which makes you more sensitive to it, which in turn means you need less of it. It also gives another health benefit in a surprising way. Exercise actually increases the level of damaging free radicals which stimulates the body to produce more protective anti-oxidants.

So should we all be trying to cut back on carbs to reduce our insulin levels?

It is a suggestion that flies in the face of 30 years of health advice to have a lower fat intake and eat plenty of long-lasting complex carbo­hydrates to keep the body supplied with energy.

There is no denying the extra­ordinary breakthrough Kenyon’s work represents and she ‘deserves the Nobel Prize for her findings about ageing’, says David Gems, deputy director of the Institute for Healthy Ageing at University ­College, London.

However he isn’t convinced we know enough for us all to start eating a low-carb diet.

‘The exact role of insulin in health and ageing is a promising and fascinating area,’ he says. ‘But I’m not sure the evidence for the benefit of cutting carbohydrates and keeping insulin levels down is strong enough yet.’

But Professor Kenyon herself doesn’t need convincing.

‘Carbo­hydrates, and especially refined ones like sugar, make you produce lots of extra insulin. I’ve been keeping my intake really low ever since I discovered this.

‘I’ve cut out all starch such as potatoes, noodles, rice, bread and pasta. Instead I have salads, but no sweet dressing, lots of olive oil and nuts, tons of green vegetables along with cheese, chicken and eggs.

‘I’ll have a hamburger without a bun and fish without batter or chips. I eat some fruit every day, but not too much and almost no processed food. I stay away from sweets, except 80 per cent chocolate.’

She is adamant it will be well worthwhile. ‘You could have two completely different careers if you could stay healthy to 90,’ she says. ‘How fascinating that would be.’

Professor Kenyon will talk about her work today on BBC World Service at 10.30am and 10pm.

Explore more:

Bristol University
How To Lose 20 PoundsLose 6 Pounds of Stomach Fat WeeklyFollowing This 1 Simple Diet
Baltimore Coupons1 ridiculously huge coupon a day.Get 50-90% off Baltimore’s best!

Add your comments

Comments (82)

Here’s what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

“Low carb diets can be potentially very dangerous leading to kidney and heart disease. Just search the web for the pros and cons of low carb diets”.

No they aren’t. For goodness sake – much of the World, til the last few 100 years, ate naturally low carbohydrate diets! If it was THAT bad for them, we wouldn’t be here! We’re running scared all the time by this sort of ‘evidence’.

Only since the advent of concentrated grain culture have starchy carbs been eaten in any quantity. There are still some groups untouched by the Western Diet that eat a very healthy, all-natural diet without processed sugar and carbohydrates. Any carbs they do get are natural & unprocessed.

If we’d eaten a natural REAL FOOD diet from birth, we’d probably have no issue with natural carbs, but the damage the processed stuff and sugar does, means that even natural carbs can be problematic for many.

People are reversing that damage on good naturally low-carb food – how can that be bad????

– Ali, Neath, Wales, 27/10/2010 23:52

Click to rate     Rating   1

Report abuse

Cutting back dramatically on starchy carbohydrate has certainly had a big effect on my life! So much so that I have totally reversed my Type 2 diabetic condition over the last two years. All my health indicator numbers are now much better than they were at diagnosis ten years ago – and at anytime in between.

These days, the healthcare people would say that I was no longer diabetic by any of the tests that they usually use to diagnose diabetes. They always say that it isn’t possible to ‘cure’ Type 2 diabetes. However, I’m not so sure!

– John, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, 27/10/2010 21:33

Click to rate     Rating   8

Report abuse

I was surprised to see this article — it hasn’t yet shown up here in the American press; and probably won’t, since low-fat is all the rage here and low-carb is considered a “fad diet” and unhealthful by mainstream media. Low-fat is actually the unhealthy and un-natural fad diet for humans. I lost over 50 pounds on LC and regained my health, reversed pre-diabetes, stopped high blood pressure, high triglycerides and I feel 20 years younger. Plus I can eat my fill and not have to starve myself using “moderation” or “portion control” diets … bleah.

– Mike, TX USA, 27/10/2010 21:28

Click to rate     Rating   3

Report abuse

I have always been interested in my diet and nutrition but it wasnt until being diagnosed type 2 diabetic that I really looked into it properly. There is no doubt, from my own blood sugar testing, that carbohydrates, especially refined ones are the demons to avoid. Doesnt mean you cant have some occasionally, after all, we need some ‘fuel’ to live but I think our diets have far too much of them. They are cheap stuffing in all sorts of processed/prepared/precooked food to keep the cost down. Whenever you can buy fresh meat & colourful/leafy veg and cook it all at home. It will actually work out cheaper and be more healthier for you. Avoid ‘low fat’ meals and so called ‘diet’ products. They are no good for you at all.

– bruce, london, 27/10/2010 18:56

Click to rate     Rating   7

Report abuse


It is not the carbs that are the problem but the chemicals that are added to carbs. Most carbs today have been filled with food chemicals that have destroyed the gut insulin.

This is the cause of the diabetes and Obesity crisis in the Western World. CARBS(PURE) ARE THE BEST THING FOR THE BODY!

The diabetes and Obesity crisis can be reversed without drugs


– Robbies, LonDon, 27/10/2010 16:05

Click to rate     Rating   30

Report abuse

‘So it’s all the delicious stuff that they want you to cut right out’.

Um. Isn’t roast lamb with mxed vegetables delicious? Or Bacon, eggs & sausages?

What you consider delicious is all relative.

There’s no harm in eating what you like – the problem comes when people are eating ONLY what they like ALL the time.

Processed carbs are addictive. They also are very nutritionally deplete. Some carbs, like sugar & white flour products actually give nothing nutritious yet rob the body blind of valuable nutrients.

Even wholegrain, supposedly good for you, is made with stored grain that lost most of its nutrition the 1st day it was ground. Unless grain is ground & used immediately, it has lost much of the nutrition in it that would help us digest it – hence the huge rise in people who are gluten intolerant.

Its ALL about nutrition. The less we get, the sicker we get.

Eat only fresh, natural foods & avoid the processed stuff like the plague – and look up Weston Price.

– Ali, Neath, Wales, 27/10/2010 14:43

Click to rate     Rating   11

Report abuse

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Add your comment

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s